patching...
Update: Is your club, business, school or church hosting an event? Click here to post it on our free event calendar! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Should Municipalities Be Able to Restrict Guns in Public Parks?

The arrest of a man for carrying a gun in a Sugar Hill park recently, and a decision by the Snellville mayor to look at possibly doing something about people carrying guns in city parks, has prompted some heated discussion.

 

In April, a Cumming resident was arrested after carrying a gun in a Sugar Hill city park. A security guard is reported to have accused him of illegally carrying a gun. He was subsequently arrested. However, he had a permit for the gun and, under Georgia law, was legally allowed to carry it. The man, Christopher Proescher, has now filed a lawsuit against the Sugar Hill security guard and the Gwinnett County police.

The case, however, prompted Snellville Mayor Kelly Kautz to raise the issue at a city council meeting. As reported in Snellville Patch, she expressed concern about people carrying guns in Snellville city parks and wanted to see if anything could be done about it. The subject has drawn some heated discussion among residents. While some share the Snellville mayor’s concerns, it has been pointed out Georgia’s law allows for gun owners who are correctly permitted to carry guns, even in public parks.

In Loganville, three men were recently arrested for an armed robbery in Bay Creek Park. One of the men allegedly pulled a gun on a visitor to the park and robbed him of a pack of cigarettes, a pocket knife and his hat.

Our question here is, if municipalities were able to place restrictions on law abiding citizens carrying guns in city or county parks, would that not leave the field open for those who carry guns for criminal purposes? 

Related Topics: question of the day

Chip Mitchell

9:23 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

To answer the question posed in the column, a prohibition on guns in any place - whether a park, government office, or college campus - only keeps guns out of the hands of individuals who are inclined to obey the law. It leaves them defenseless to criminals who have no regard for the law. However, another important aspect of allowing the State to have sole regulation of firearms laws is a very practical one: It allows citizens of Georgia to have a common set of laws to follow state-wide. It would be unfair and impractical for a citizen to research and remember which of Georgia's 159 counties and 600+ cities allow guns in parks, not to mention having to do the same for dozens of other types of locations.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

1:10 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

How about a sign that says NO GUNS ALLOWED. Works for smoking. Your logic would basically do away with all city ordinances.

Patch_comments_icon

Sharon Swanepoel

10:03 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Chip, I'm really not a big gun proponent, but I do respect the Second Amendment. I too think if you make it illegal to carry guns anywhere, only those who don't respect the law will carry them. I hadn't thought about the fact that someone could go to one park and it be allowed, and another and it not. Leaving the gun in a car can be just as risky these days with all the car break ins.

Reply

Brian Crawford

1:06 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

The last thing I want is for my family to get caught in a gun battle between a couple of idiots while enjoying our local park. Please keep your guns at home and live out your George Zimmerman fantasies somewhere else.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron McClellan

3:15 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

The only problem there Brian, is when the bad guys know that the good guys are prohibited from otherwise lawful carry, there are folks who might be inclined to live out their Columbine fantasies . . .right there in your park. Believe it or not, most folks lawfully carrying aren't prone to getting into gun battles with each other.

Dave Emanuel

2:34 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Brian- Apparently you believe that aside from law enforcement, only criminals should carry guns. And it seems you also believe in violating state laws that aren't consistent with your point of view. The state legislature enacted specific laws pertaining to the regulation of firearms and municipalities cannot preempt those laws.
As for getting caught in a gun battle between a couple of idiots, let me assure you that most law abiding citizens who have carry permits are not idiots. And while you choose to denigrate anyone who legally carries a gun, I think your perspective would be a bit different if one of those "idiots" came to your defense while you being assaulted by a criminal, and saved your life.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

2:52 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Dave, I've survived 55 years without needing to tote a gun everywhere I go. No one in my family has been assaulted in all that time because we mostly treat others with respect and mind our own business. I'll take my chances.

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

3:05 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Thankfully on this point, you don’t speak for ALL of us.

Comment_arrow

Karsten Torch

10:32 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

It's funny, but I've survived a tad over 40 years with never needing to use my fire extinguisher in my house, but I still have one. Loaded and ready to go.

Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

3:26 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

When was the last time you strapped that thing on your hip and ran around putting out fires?

Comment_arrow

Karsten Torch

4:52 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

I'll admit - that's a valid question. If I had to worry about the possibility of being somewhere that a fire could break out and there would not be any fire extinguishers on the premises, I probably would.

Comment_arrow

Floyd Akridge

5:01 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Karsten...what a great point...love it.

Comment_arrow

Ron McClellan

3:17 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

"I've survived 55 years without needing to tote a gun everywhere I go. No one in my family has been assaulted in all that time because we mostly treat others with respect and mind our own business. I'll take my chances."

That's the same thing lots of fifty six year old crime victims said just one year earlier!

Grant

2:54 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Brian..

Dude 0 for 2 in two days? I'm embarrassed for you at this point .
Let's think like adults for a moment about the failure of your "No Guns Allowed " Sign. What's a law abiding , legally carrying citizen to do when presented with this little violation of his Constitutional rights? Obviously he cant carry because the Brian Crawford Sign supersedes the Constitution so he has to leave his firearm in "locked" his car. You are aware that it's pretty easy for just about anyone with opposible thumbs to break into a car right?
So , now the kid that was breaking into cars stealing I Pods is armed and

IN THE PARK !
Brilliant
Maybe you didnt think your cunning plan all the way through chum?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

3:06 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

For some reason it doesn't surprise me that you're a gun fetishist.

Comment_arrow

Ron McClellan

3:18 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

"gun fetishist" . . . .oh Geez.

Grant

3:20 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

I'm not at all Brian,
Though I am certain that Snellville's halfwit Mayor has no business meddling with carry laws and that the Constitution grants the right to "keep and bear" arms.

I'm smart enough to understand where the bad guys GET their guns. More often than not they steal them because , you see ,they are criminals.Once they steal them they carry them and use them wherever they please because , as mentioned previously, they are criminals who dont care about your "No Guns Allowed" sign..

I would think a gent like yourself would be all about making it more difficult for criminals to obtain firearms.
Tell me , do you think it's easier for a bad guy to steal a gun from an unattended parked car than it is for him to to take it away from it's (armed) owner?

Reply

Dave Emanuel

3:23 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Brian- I hope you survive for many more without being threatened or assaulted. But, you know, it only takes once. So from what you're saying, if someone was pointing a gun at you, (possibly because you treated him with respect, but not the proper amount of respect) and a legally armed citizen walked by, you would prefer that he or she kept on walking and let you take your chances.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

3:44 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Yep, lest I or some innocent bystander get's hit with a stray bullet, it only takes one you know.

Comment_arrow

Dave Emanuel

3:49 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Sorry I misunderstood you Brian-- apparently you feel a properly targeted bullet is less deadly than a stray bullet. I sincerely hope you don't experience the folly of your argument.

Comment_arrow

Floyd Akridge

5:03 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Dave...hahahaha...good one.

Comment_arrow

Ron McClellan

3:22 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

"Yep, lest I or some innocent bystander get's hit with a stray bullet, it only takes one you know."

Hmmmm . . .really gonna go with that Brian? Really? Maybe you would get lucky, and the armed good sumaritan would mind his own business and let you merely deal with that one bullet in the pointing the gun at you. On the plus side, at that range your fear for innocent bystanders lives is probably minimised.

Grant

3:29 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Or maybe just point to the "No Guns Allowed" sign ?

Reply

Marne M

3:41 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

I think that referring to permitted gun-carrying citizens as "idiots," is rather harsh. In my career in law enforcement, they are some of the most respectful, courteous, law-abiding citizens that I encounter.

I carry pretty much everywhere, and with reason. I've put some very bad people in jail, and I've been stalked by some of the people that I have put in jail. I don't begrudge people doing what they feel is best for their own safety. We have a right to bear arms, and I don't personally feel that a public park qualifies as a reasonable exception.

Reply

Mack

4:14 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

As a combat veteran I disagree with Brian. All it takes is one,stray or otherwise, to harm you. Have been to several parks in Gwinnett and other places and have noticed several firearms carried by what appears to be 'kids' and others. The 'No Guns Allowed' signage is there only for law abiding citizens, a criminal ignores the laws. Agree that it is a shame that we can not go into a park with out the fear of being robbed but that is a fact of our society and utter disrespect by criminals for our laws. I personaly welcome some one with a firearm to be in a park, that is legal of course. If a criminal thinks he may be 'out guned' he will not do anything. So get legal and start carriing. For the next thug that tries to rob may be the one who is trying to rob Brian.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

4:49 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Thank you for both your service and your concern!

Beth

4:19 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Brian, It is your choice not to own a gun but it is ALL of our 2nd ammendment rights to legally own and carry a gun if we so choose. I being a 49 year old female, have legally obtained my carriers permit and am proficient in using guns. I'm glad everyone does not feel the way you do as it is MY right to protect myself and my family. Criminals have guns and use them daily in criminal acts. As far as George Zimmerman, it sounds to me like you have already found him guilty without proof. Just like a demorat!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

4:40 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

I never said I didn't own a gun.

Dave Ballard

4:27 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Declaring an area a "no weapons" zone is tantamount to an "Open Season!" sign for thugs. Just ask the students of Georgia Tech who are getting assaulted daily on their own campus. Or those of Virginia Tech, or of Colombine, who desperately waited for help. Or the soldiers at FT. Hood, for that matter. Etc., etc., etc.

The fact is, whether it's the cops, a bystander, or the shooter themselves taking their own life, nothing stops a criminal shooter except another shooter. Making a law or posting a sign guarantees that response is as far away as possible.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

5:00 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

So you think the answer is arming high school and college students? "Hey! Let's all play beer pong and then try out that cool pistol your dad bought you!" The average citizen has no training in how to handle a crisis situation, I would much rather leave policing to trained professionals.

Comment_arrow

Marne M

5:15 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Again, it seems like you're taking the worst possible viewpoint, Brian. My 17-year-old cousin recently obtained permission from his parents to join the National Guard a year early. He's going through Basic Training before completing his Senior Year of High School. You can bet he will know how to handle a weapon.

I'd much rather that the policing was left to trained professionals as well. But trained professionals can't be everywhere at once, and sometimes it's far too late by the time they get to the scene.

Many teenagers grow up with a healthy respect of weapons. They hunt with their parents. They may even learn to use a pistol to protect themselves. Both Archery and shooting are skills that are taught by 4H programs across the country. They know and understand that alcohol and firearms do not mix.

Comment_arrow

Dave Ballard

5:17 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Nice cherry-picking job, but there were people of legal age in all of those situations I mentioned, Brian, including a teacher at Colombine who because of local laws and school district policy, did not have his weapon available at the time the shooting started. He and several of his students died.

Try again.

Brian Crawford

4:38 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

When the Second Amendment was written the most powerful weapons available were single shot muzzle loaders. It took even the most expert marksman a full 20 seconds to load and fire a round. I'm pretty sure our founding fathers thought we would have enough sense to make whatever laws necessary to keep the general population safe. By the way, if you all want to arm yourselves with muzzle loaders I'm okay with that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave Ballard

5:05 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Check your histories, Brian: private citizens of that day could (and did) own horses, cannon, and fortified compounds, not to mention the ability to produce their own ammunition. This meant that the private citizen (assuming they could afford it) could be every bit as well armed as the military of their day. Imagining a populace as well armed as the Army or Marines today gives you FITS, doesn't it? Nevertheless, that was the situation when the 2nd Amendment was written and ratified.

For that reason, and because of the actual words of the Amendment, I reject out of hand your assertion in re: the founding fathers. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, neither by your fear of a free and independent public, nor by your need for a governmental security blanket, nor most certainly by a government intent on growing its own power at the expense of its subjects.

Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

5:31 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

While there may have been a handful of wealthy land owners who could afford fortified compounds protected by cannon, the average citizen in 1791 was not that well armed. This undermines the "defense against tyranny" argument.

Comment_arrow

Dave Ballard

5:45 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

It doesn't negate the premise at all. The weapons that showed up to Lexington and Concord were privately owned. The militia that finally defeated the British was equipped in large part (cannon, muskets and otherwise) by weapons brought to the fight FROM HOME.

Granted, the Continental Army was later augmented by weaponry provided by their local communities and governments, and certainly it was not through private donations alone that those men were resupplied with ammunition over nearly a decade of rebellion. But the fight started with privately owned weapons, without which independence would have been impossible.

Comment_arrow

Racer X

8:21 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012

Brian, There is an old saying in the South, "If you argue with a fool, what is the fool doing?" To that end, I won't be arguing with you, lest I lower myself. God put people like us on earth to protect people like you and though we may likely regret it, protect you we shall.

Mitch

4:47 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Brian, take your NO GUNS ALLOWED sign and place it on your front door. See which house the next criminal chooses to break into. Whether you like it or not, the fact that criminals do not know who carries concealed weapons makes us all safer, both in our own homes and out in public including parks.

Reply

Grant

4:53 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Brian writes

"By the way, if you all want to arm yourselves with muzzle loaders I'm okay with that."
I thought you were worried about stray bullets? Old school muzzle loading muskets were not very accurate
In any case what you're OK with in this instance doesnt matter a bit ....

Reply

Ben

7:47 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012

I don't Think the Suspects that robbed the people in Bay Creek Park or any other park would read or think about No Guns Allowed, Signs in a Park or any other place, when they want to rob or hurt somebody, Guns are for proction of Law abiding citizens and there children, a Lot of Drug Deals so the Police Say are in Parks, Murders, Rape's & Child molesters also and Citys want to build more, Parks!They sould have a Separate Guard Division in Parks, Probility would catch a lot of Drug Deals, Not People going to work, School or Church in a Speed trap along the road.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

8:23 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012

I think you've found our problem...it's all those d@mn parks! No more parks! No more green spaces! And no more speed traps!

Comment_arrow

Dave Ballard

9:28 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012

Hey, Brian: I think we have a winner!

Brian Crawford

8:18 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012

For the record, I'm a gun owner. Grew up in the woods hunting with my father. I don't believe guns should be banned. I do believe we need sensible gun control including where people are allowed to carry loaded weapons.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron McClellan

3:29 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Okay . . .where is the sense in creating laws that disarm good guys, and don't apply to the bad guys . . .even though it's supposed to. Doesn't seem too "sensible" Brian.

You have to "have sense" to recognize that I guess.

Dave M

9:09 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012

I retired after 32 years in Law Enforcement and can only state that prohibiting guns from people authorized with CC permits will not solve any perceived problem. Bad guys carry guns no matter what signs you put up or ordinances you pass. You simply make the law abiding citizen less safe and able to defend him or herself. If you don't want to carry a gun then don't! I have carried a firearm since I was 21 and I'm now in my 60's. I would find it impossible to place a value on my ability to protect myself and others but apparently the Snellville Mayor knows best and is willing to remove my right and that of others with legal permits. How ignorant and arrogant. GCPD should know better. The arresting officer deserves a "do better" letter in his/her file. They should know the law.

Reply

Ben

9:38 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012

To the one that has commented on this issue, more than any one, You Said you when Hunting with your father, years ago, Did you go Deer Hunting, Rabbit or What Ever, Maybe the Animals that you were going to hunt, Got the Democrat Party to get a bill going that the Animals wants all hunters to Ban Guns, Spears, Knife's, Bow & Arrow Etc. And the Animals had the Democratic Party put signs in the Woods, Parks, Farm Land and so on Not to use guns, Remember Bamby did not want his mother killed also. The Law abidding People of the Country, Want to be safe from the People we all have talked about in this Issue, Remember if People Would not Kill, Rob, Rape Etc. we would not have to Have Guns for our Proctection, Only for hunting Food.

Reply

Count Raoul

9:45 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012

Brian, let me say it clearly so all here can read it. I AGREE WITH YOU! But boy is the opposition loud. The Second Amendment fanatics (I said it) appear to want bazookas legalized and every voter armed. Myself, I think Madison, Morris and Jefferson would be aghast at what they and their team have wrought. In 1785 the most lethal handgun was a single shot dueling pistol and holsters had not yet been invented. Today, handguns can stop Cadillacs with a good shot. It's the handguns folks. I keep a rifle and a shotgun for sport and home protection. I wouldn't have a handgun in my house if you gave it to me. Now before you start jumpin’ on me about wanting to tear up the Constitution, just stop. I support every law that we have. But I want the handgun laws and the carry laws changed. Till then, I’m stayin’ out of your parks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron McClellan

1:20 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Okay, you will stay out of the parks until armed, law abiding citizens are removed from the parks. That way, just the unarmed law abiding citizens and armed thugs will be in the parks. Let me know how that works out for ya!

David

10:07 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012

As a person that along with his wife and five year old son was accosted by two gun carrying thugs on a public street in broad daylight, I am glad I was armed at the time. I wanted to run but mainly wanted to protect my family. I tried talking our way out of it, tried offering them my wallet, my money, my watch but that wasn't enough for them. When they ripped my wife's blouse and pointed a gun directly at my son's face, I reacted like I had to. No special training on how to handle a crisis situation, no concern about stray bullets, no concern for my own life. The end result is we are all safe, my son is now a respected engineer, there is one less thug alive to accost anyone else, and there is one young man who turned his life around while serving prison time. I live with the knowledge of taking a boy's life, however, I would do it again if necessary although I hope it never happens to me again or anyone else. I still legally carry a weapon and always will, sign or no sign.

Reply

Cassie Brown

10:43 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012

Municipalities should not be able to ban guns across the board anywhere. There are reasons we have carry laws. If you are following the law then there should be no problem.

Reply

Karsten Torch

1:18 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

I for one am disappointed with Kelly for taking this stand and stating something so blatantly ignorant, but I'll take it up with her next time I see her. In the meantime, I will carry where I can, try to avoid places where I can't, and take my chances. I don't worry about it too much where concealed carry is allowed, but do tend to have reservations going somewhere that I'm not allowed to be armed. Because, as stated, that's where the criminals feel the safest. Disarming law-abiding citizens is just dumb. Simply put.

The founding fathers wanted us armed for several reasons, but mainly to keep the government from getting out of hand again. I worry about a government that wants its citizens unarmed - they can be up to nothing good. Not only that, but look at the statistics - wherever guns have been outlawed, crime goes up. Exponentially. When guns are introduced, crime drops. Simple to see why. It used to be illegal to carry in parks, but people were getting attacked and robbed by criminals who knew this. The law was changed to give citizens a fighting chance - it was on purpose. And it's not up to some podunk mayor (with respect, Kelly...) to change the law for whatever reason.

The person who worries about the gun-carrying citizens that are allowed to carry, and not so much about the criminal, and thinks that the laws will change that latter person's behavior is just not paying attention....

Reply

David Brawner

9:47 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

Brian, I haven't needed a spare tire in years, but I still carry one in my car. I also carry gun often. I carry in such a way that you never know. I have made it 55 years and never needed to use one. I hope I never need to use it.

Reply

David Brawner

9:51 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

David M, if this was facebook I would like your comment.

Reply

Karsten Torch

2:46 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Allright, I need to clarify some things. First, the author of the piece we're commenting on really needs to research first and not ask questions in such a leading way. The guy that was arrested was open-carrying, which is fine, but became overly belligerent when approached by the security guard. Oh, and he had his posse with him that was recording everything. He was arrested for disorderly conduct, not carring a weapon. Second, Kelly never said she wanted to ban guns. She made the comment that she needed to see if people were actually allowed to carry in Snellville parks, as her understanding of the law was a bit fuzzy. Turns out, they are. And that cities and counties are not allowed to limit places where licensed holders can carry. If the state says they can, then they can, and no local ordinance can change that. So....I gues that, as they say, is that.....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

2:49 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Party pooper. Why let the truth get in the way of a good political debate.

Grant

3:04 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Kautz understanding of the law "fuzzy" ?

I award Karsten 2 entire internets for the best use of understatement online today .

Winner!

Reply

Robert N.

4:39 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Pass laws like these and all the criminals and psycos would know that everyone at the park is unarmed and sitting ducks...I wouldn't take my kids to the park or go there myself. Most gun laws just make it hard for law abiding citizens to legally own and carry, CRIMINALS do not obey the laws anyway, so keep making new laws and regulations, Hitler did.....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

4:56 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Hitler, seriously? You must be a Joe the Plumber fan. I wonder how much the NRA paid him to run that ad? http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eBTDMLZwdpE

Comment_arrow

Ron McClellan

9:50 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

BRIAN CRAWFORD: Hitler, seriously?

Yes Brian, seriously. Tell ya what, why don't you point out what you perseive as the problem with that comparison . . . .and I'll pretty much school you on the realities . . .in a way you will find most embarrassing. You kinda suck at supporting your position.

Karsten Torch

10:31 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

Want proof of the thought that outlawing guns brings out the criminals? Look no further than our great Georgia Tech campus downtown. 3 muggings this weekend. And no plans to let students or teachers that are authorized to carry everywhere else carry. Damn shame. Would be nice to hear a couple of stories about those criminals becoming statistics. Stories like that just warm my heart....

Reply

Marne M

8:50 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

It's a good thing this immature, drunken college student happened to have a gun...

http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/intruder-shot-in-the-1464583.html

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

9:57 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

So you're applauding this guy shooting some stupid unarmed student who got high/drunk and stumbled into the wrong house? You think the kid deserved to die for his stupidity? That could have been anyone's child. Do you have any idea how often this happens on college campuses? Let me answer that...it happens a lot. Be careful what you wish for.

Comment_arrow

David

10:08 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Yes Brian, I'm applauding him. It could have been anyone's child? It was someone's child. That doesn't excuse his actions. He broke into the wrong house while high on drugs and charged at the wrong person. Or maybe he charged at the right person. Don't do drugs, stay out of houses you're not invited to, don't get shot.

The Marines taught me the three tap method...two to the chest, one to the head. Might have been worse for the druggie if it was my house he broke into.

Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

10:17 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Well aren't you a credit to the human race. Shoot first ask questions later!

"There was some video footage and it just appears like he was just confused which was his house," Roberson said. "Unfortunately, the people inside didn't know what he was doing. And he was, according to everyone that we've interviewed, came across as high on something other than alcohol."

Comment_arrow

Marne M

11:04 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

It's dishonest to pick and choose which parts of the news you quote. It was also stated that the poor confused guy charged the homeowner. Was he supposed to allow himself to be assaulted? Was he supposed to wait until it was too late to see if the guy might have had a weapon? Maybe he should have aimed for an arm or a leg (I get that one all the time -- why didn't you just shoot the gun out of his hand.) If someone breaks into my house in the middle of the night and charges me, you can bet that I'm not going to stand around and ask questions. You can Monday-morning quarterback the situation all day long, but in reality, this person had seconds to make a decision that you have the leisure of days to insult.

Marne M

10:09 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Brian -- I worked for five years in the Major Felony Unit of one of the highest crime areas of Atlanta. I think I probably have a better finger on just how often guns are used and in what capacity than most people. You get the right defend yourself, in a park, and most especially in your own home. Just because the media reports something in a sympathetic manner, doesn't mean that's what actually happened. I'm sorry for the loss of life, but I'm not sorry that maybe people will think twice about their criminal actions near the Tech Campus in the future.

Every criminal is someone's child. It's a terrible thing to have to tell the family and loved ones of a person that their child has passed, no matter what the circumstances. I know, because I've been that person many times, and whether it's a baby or a 24-year-old drug dealer, it's still awful. But that doesn't free someone from responsibility for their actions.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

10:28 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Here's the problem Marne. We've created a culture where any damn fool feels empowered to carry, brandish and discharge his weapon whenever they darn well please. Bad things are bound to happen. Just ask the Gwinnett homeowner who recently woke up to find a bullet had passed through his house.

Comment_arrow

Grant

12:06 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

I'd give odd that the bullet fired through the Gwinnett house wasnt fired by a law abiding citizen with a carry permit. More likely it came from a criminal , a stupid criminal ...Get rid of the stupid dangerous criminals and the rest of us wont need to arm ourselves.

And , for the record I'm with David. Some drugged out idiot comes charging through my door in the middle of the night I'm not gonna spend time chatting him up either

Comment_arrow

Marne M

12:24 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Actually Grant (and I believe it likely that Brian was holding this part back intentionally) it was fired by a former New York Police Officer who got into an argument with his wife and decided to start shooting wildly.

It doesn't matter, however. Of course, people behave like human beings, which means they sometimes act unlawfully and do unreasonable (and dangerous) things. They don't need guns to do this -- they can do it perfectly well with cars, and boats, and swimming pools, or with drugs and alcohol. I'll take the occasional random chance that my house gets hit by a bullet (and our roof did take a peppering from a shotgun once) in exchange for the ability to defend myself and my family, and for others to do the same.

Comment_arrow

Grant

1:16 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

I should have known that
A) Brian was sitting on "the rest of the story"
B) There was a woman to blame (kidding!)

Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

2:32 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Hahaha...why would I sit on that part of the story? That makes it even better, if the guy was an ex-cop he probably had a permit for the gun. I guess not only criminals perform stupid gun tricks after all. Thanks for enhancing my argument.

Comment_arrow

Marne M

2:41 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

That occasionally otherwise law-abiding citizens do unreasonable things doesn't "enhance" any argument. Occasionally otherwise law-abiding citizens beat their wives, rape someone, strangle someone, steal something, embezzle money from their company, or imbibe an intoxicating substance and get in their car and wipe out a whole family. When they do, they're charged appropriately, and the wheels of the justice system turn.

In no way does that erase the rights that people have to bear arms and defend themselves, their homes and their families.

Comment_arrow

Grant

2:51 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Sorry Brian... no enhancement for you ...

Seems this guy left the force in 1986 and is NOT licensed to carry here in Georgia .
Of course , as I suggested, he was performing a criminal act . If you can make all the criminals go away we wont need our guns

Marne M

11:00 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

The thing I find most offensive if that you have continually referred to legal, responsible gun owners as fools, idiots, immature, etc. That's my husband you're talking about, and my father, and my brother (none of whom are cops). That's my cousins who have fought to serve their country and also have carry permits in the United States. That's my uncles and aunts, none of whom has ever used a firearm illegally in any manner. It's simply not the case with the vast majority of responsible gun owners.

And we didn't create this culture, it was created by the founding fathers when they guaranteed the right to bear arms, as has already been discussed in this thread.

Reply

David

3:33 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Everyday, sometimes multiple times a day, Brian posts ridiculous articles, always from the ultra liberal point of view. They receive many responses and he adds even more ridiculous far left crap. I suppose its entertaining to him but for those of us that easily recognize idiot ramblings, its just more foolishness, the same type of foolishness that moved our great country toward socialism and got a socialist elected to our highest office. Disrespect for the Constitution is borderline treason to me. And if I didn't recognize Brian as a lonely COB, I would consider him a treasonist. As it is, I quit playing his games immediately and let him live out his lonely life in his fantasy filled head.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

7:00 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Soooo, I guess that means you won't be subscribing to my newsletter?

Ben

9:28 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

If the Patch has Hired you do give your weird Liberal comments, then you are doing a good Job of being Crazy, Weird, Liberal, for other people to comment on what you have had to say, you are doing a great Job, I read the Patch every Day, to see what is going on in (3) Area's, I don't need to read Junk like this, So YES, I would not miss it, I am control of my self, I can or don't have to read the Patch or anything else, that has JUNK Views or Comments Like you have

Reply

Ben

8:05 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012

your web site would not come up, sorry, you are such a looser about the truth, people kill people all the time, what about wife's killing there husbans with a car, see news several months ago, she ran over him, maybe they need some signs no cars

Reply

Leave a comment